Topics in this domain

KPIs and KGIs

Management · 2 min read

Three questions, three indicators

Think about a marathon runner. The finishing time is the result: a goal indicator. The weekly training distance shows whether they’re on track: a performance indicator. A sore knee is an early warning that something could go wrong: a risk indicator.

IT governance uses the same three kinds of measure.

KGI measures results, KPI measures process performance, KRI warns of rising risk.
IndicatorMeasuresTimingExample
Key goal indicator (KGI)Whether a goal was achievedLagging: after the factShare of projects delivering their expected benefits
Key performance indicator (KPI)How well a process is working, and whether the goal is on trackLeading: duringShare of projects with an approved business case before funding
Key risk indicator (KRI)Changes in risk exposureEarly warningNumber of privileged accounts with no owner

The KGI/KPI split comes from COBIT’s goals and metrics approach: the KGI tells management what was achieved; the KPI tells it how well the process is doing along the way.

What makes a metric useful

  • Specific and measurable: a clear formula and data source
  • Linked to a goal: it supports a business or IT objective
  • Timely: available soon enough to act on
  • Owned: someone is responsible for the result
  • Targeted: it has a target and, for KRIs, thresholds that trigger escalation
  • Worth collecting: the effort is justified

Outcome measures usually beat activity counts. “Training sessions delivered” says little about behaviour. “Phishing simulation click rate” says much more.

Example. IT’s headline monthly number is “500 incidents closed”. That’s activity. A better set: a KGI of availability of critical services against target, a KPI of incidents resolved within target time, and a KRI of repeat incidents with no problem record raised.

Auditing metrics

The auditor checks that metrics link to goals, the data behind them is reliable (calculation and source are controlled), targets are set, results reach the right people, and action follows when targets are missed.

How the exam asks about it

If the question asks…The answer is usually…
Indicator measuring whether a goal was achievedKGI
Indicator measuring process performance towards a goalKPI
Indicator giving early warning of rising riskKRI
Best metric for awareness training effectivenessA behaviour or outcome measure, not attendance
What makes a metric actionableA target or threshold, an owner, and timely reporting

In short

  • A key goal indicator (KGI) measures whether a goal was achieved: an outcome, measured afterwards (lagging).
  • A key performance indicator (KPI) measures how well a process is working, and whether the goal is likely to be met (leading).
  • A key risk indicator (KRI) signals that risk exposure is changing, giving early warning.
  • Good metrics are specific, measurable, linked to goals, timely, and owned by someone.
  • Metrics need targets or thresholds, and someone who acts when they're missed.

Exam traps

  • KGI = did we achieve the goal? KPI = how well is the process working towards it?
  • Counting activity (training sessions delivered) is weaker than measuring outcomes (fewer phishing clicks).
  • A metric with no target or owner rarely leads to action.
  • KRIs need thresholds that trigger escalation.

Slides

Click the slide and use the arrow keys. F toggles full screen.

CISA · Domain 2 · Management

KPIs and KGIs

Three kinds of indicator: did we reach the goal (KGI), is the process on track (KPI), and is risk growing (KRI). Plus what makes a metric actually useful.

1 / 8